4th October 2004, 14:11
Drago
(*.dialup.optusnet.com.au) wrote:
This website is becoming inactive o_o
oioi :D
"Yeah, search engines don't care about meta tags anymore do they?"
afaik: they dont care about meta tags. perhaps because its the year 2004 and software is able to analyse text. so there isnt really a need for meta-keywords?
"Anyway, I made the title a little more descriptive."
ja, looks quite optimized. :D
there is one keyword id add: c http://www.flickr.com/photos/cornis-screen-shots/697191/ ##> "download"
"download cool maps" or sth for example.
btw, i dont play w:a. :P wwp is better. :P
"Yeah, search engines don't care about meta tags anymore do they?"
afaik: they dont care about meta tags. perhaps because its the year 2004 and software is able to analyse text. so there isnt really a need for meta-keywords?
"Anyway, I made the title a little more descriptive."
ja, looks quite optimized. :D
there is one keyword id add: c http://www.flickr.com/photos/cornis-screen-shots/697191/ ##> "download"
"download cool maps" or sth for example.
btw, i dont play w:a. :P wwp is better. :P
3rd October 2004, 16:17
aliceInChains
(*.dip.t-dialin.net) wrote:
Yeah, search engines don't care about meta tags anymore do they?
The search engine ranking of the WMDB is horrible.
Anyway, I made the title a little more descriptive.
The search engine ranking of the WMDB is horrible.
Anyway, I made the title a little more descriptive.
2nd October 2004, 02:17
TonY
(*.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) wrote:
"meta" was ignored by the parser
2nd October 2004, 02:16
TonY
(*.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) wrote:
You must mean the <meta> tag...
add game names (wwp, wa, world party....) to title tag. google bot needs to know. title-tag-occurance is a v important ranking factor.
rope on,
light
rope on,
light
1st October 2004, 17:26
aliceInChains
(*.dip.t-dialin.net) wrote:
I'm busy right now with other stuff really but I'll write that down
1st October 2004, 01:18
TonY
(*.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) wrote:
A suggestion: Add a "most popular" maps page... where they're sorted by downloads....
1st October 2004, 01:16
TonY
(*.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) wrote:
Don't care? I care about this site... it's the best place for color maps =)
you post a lot for somebody who doesn't care, tony ;)
20th September 2004, 13:39
aliceInChains
(*.dip.t-dialin.net) wrote:
ah ;)
20th September 2004, 04:11
TonY
(*.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) wrote:
The problem definitely exists, I posted in more detail you-know-where.
20th September 2004, 04:06
TonY
(*.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) wrote:
They're all on RRkit.com, upload them yourself if you want to... I don't...
19th September 2004, 21:08
aliceInChains
(*.dip.t-dialin.net) wrote:
That's weird. I really have no idea why they could be missing. Can you reupload one or two of the missing ones so we can see if they were really on the wmdb before? Maybe it's just in your head =D
19th September 2004, 16:58
TonY
(*.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) wrote:
Not all the maps I posted @ the beginning are there.... most aren't... fix the problem if you care to... I don't.. heh..
19th September 2004, 16:15
DrAgO
(*.dialup.optusnet.com.au) wrote:
you should limit the page numbers to say 30. everytime a new map is added the last map on page 30 gets deleted and so on. this could help mayb :\ just a little suggestion
19th September 2004, 12:25
aliceInChains
(*.dip.t-dialin.net) wrote:
Huh? No I'm not, they're all there. But I'm close to a webspace problem, that's right.
19th September 2004, 10:41
TonY
(*.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) wrote:
Are you getting rid of old maps to save space...? Because I can't find some of the oolder ones from the beginning >:/
17th September 2004, 16:17
aliceInChains
(*.dip.t-dialin.net) wrote:
Hey charlyhustle, what about the "1000th" map we did? Did any other people contribute their skills? Is it ready?
17th September 2004, 13:54
charlyhustle
(*.tnt3.syd2.da.uu.net) wrote:
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAH smilies :D