If it wasn't for HostingBuddy giving access to my maps to people who can't host, I'd remove all my maps here and upload them to TUS and other smaller sites. But then again, HB picks map with better tags. I think the official reviewing is TERRIBLE and BIASED. Either recruit capable, ACTIVE reviewers, or update HB to take user reviewing in account ASAP.
Let's just take Wyvern's Tranquility map. Its first rating was "Sprites". SPRITES!!!!!!!! No elaborate, no GG, no original: effen "Sprites". On a hand-drawn map. That's not what I'd call accurate/competent reviewing.
Most of us read the story of Userc479 reviewing 9000 maps (no vegeta joke) at a pace of 8 second per map. And we can't put the blame on him completely either. It means that the previous staff slacked big time on their job. WMDB needs fresh blood, and the inactive reviewers shown the door. We can all be grateful to UserC479 for at least reviewing all the maps quickly and daily. I find it pretty damn wrong that he's arguably the only one doing it.
Again, the reviewing process with tags is ridiculous. I think you'll all agree that there are Top-Tier and Crap-Tier "None" maps, and this goes with all the other tags. Nothing about playability or difficulty rating(even though it is more of a user rated aspect). The tags lost their meaning anyway with this lousy rating. Not to mention the way they are explained in the Docs section.
TL;DR: WMDB needs to get their **** together as the community needs their services, for now.
yo, masta, i didn't understand the half you said (do u use translator??? Oo), but if you got involved in that conversation, i don't think you, for example, would accept that so insulty, if some1 asked u, for example, to delete this, for example, map #17636 becasue of "not too linear layout" xD
You would just say: ...*fatal imagination error*
shadow - i daren't delete it - to me it's like looking back over baby photo's and seeing them grow up...just like my stuff since i started map making that's why i keep them on there